
Subtle changes are afoot in BCSLand.
Over the past several years, due to screaming from the fans and AMPLIFICATION by the media most D1A teams with undefeated seasons, with a "0" in the loss column bubbled up to the top of the BCS rankings by the end of the season, no matter where they started.
In pre-BCS 1992 D1A undefeated Alabama was#1, undefeated Miami was #3, undefeated Michigan was #5, undefeated Texas A&M was #7, and undefeated Bowling Green was unranked.
With the introduction of the BCS rankings, things started to improve.
In 2004 at the end of the regular season, undefeated USC #1 played undefeated Oklahoma #2 while undefeated Auburn #3 was hosed out of the finals along with undefeated Utah #6 and undefeated Boise State #9. No undefeated were out of the top 10, but they all didn't go to the top.
By 2009, things all came together and the 6 undefeateds for the Regular Season (including Florida which lost the SEC Championship to also undefeated Alabama) were ranked #1-6. Bama, Texas, Cincinnati, TCU, Florida, Boise State.
But are things starting to backslide with the anticipation of the new rules and the mysterious "Selection Committee".
As of Week 9 in 2012, the 10 undefeateds were ranked 1,2,3,4,5,7,11,15,16,24. Will the lower ranked undefeated have the good grace to lose, or bubble up? I don't think so. I think we are quietly starting to see the bifurcation of D1A into the Power 5 conferences and the Little 5 conferences, due to a lack of leadership from the NCAA to make the concept of "Division" actually mean anything.
Wait until the Selection Committee gets here.


Recent Article Comments Widget
Recent Forum Posts
Shared Medical Reports?
Yeah, I get the reason why the teams want it. They want to minimize risk, but, as you say.......
Rich Gapinski 05-21-2013 02:32 PM