• 2012 FP Upset Special Challenge: Week #10



    As we begin the trek down the back stretch there is a lead pack at six wins (Trumpetbdw, chris, Colts01, brauneyz and Pruitt) closely followed by a smaller pack at five (DaBearsFan, mikesteelnation1 and jfkaspar).

    Current Standings

    Last Week

    I need image ideas. I'm rather proud of my job masking out a bunch of grass and rebuilding the edges this week (need to learn how to build beveled edges without copying) but am bereft of ideas for week 11 and beyond. None of us want to see my boring collage of 11's. Please send me your awesome 11's (and beyond).

    Now on to Week #10 of the FP Upset Special Challenge. Let's get busy.

    You can join us every week. You can join mid-season. If you miss a week, so what? Come back next week. We're just glad you're here and you'll always have me to talk to down at the bottom of the standings.

    Rules:

    • One pick per week
    • Your chosen team must be at least a (+3) underdog (Only games listed in this column are eligible)
    • Your chosen team must win the game outright (no 'pushes' or 'covers')
    • Season winner is the one with the most upsets correctly chosen between Week #1 through the Conference Championship Games (20 weeks all together)
    • There will be a points system to determine a winner in the event of a tie
    • Points will be accumulated by adding the game spreads for your correct picks (if you take Carolina (+4.5) and Carolina wins, you will be awarded a win and 4.5 points). Be careful making picks based on the number of points possible. Points only count if you are tied for the total wins lead when the whole contest is finished.
    • The No Upsets Option: Predict correctly that 'No Upsets' will occur in any given week and you will be awarded one win and a point total equal to the sum of all the spreads in that week's Upset Special. If you wish to exercise the 'No Upsets' Option, that prediction is due by 5 minutes prior to kickoff of the first game of the week in question. This includes Thursday Night Football and Saturday Playoff games. The 'No Upsets' option is confined to the Upset Possibilities listed in this article.
    • Picks are due no later than 5 minutes before the scheduled start of the broadcast time for your game. The FootballPros.com time stamp on your post is gospel.
    • Spread lines will be posted Wednesday and will remain static throughout the week. This isn't The Sports Book at Caesar's Palace, after all.


    Prizes to be determined but may include a cool icon denoting your status as *ahem* Upset Special Top Dog, a hat or t-shirt or possibly tickets to the Super Bowl (NOT!!)

    Week #10 Upset Special Possibilities (odds by OddsShark). Underdogs in bold.

    Thursday Night Football

    • Colts @ Jaguars (+3)


    Sunday Early Games

    • Bills (+12) @ Patriots
    • Titans (+7) @ Dolphins
    • Broncos @ Panthers (+4)
    • Chargers (+3) @ Buccaneers
    • Giants @ Bengals (+4)


    Sunday Late Games

    • Jets (+7.5) @ Seahawks
    • Rams (+12.5) @ 49ers


    Sunday Night Football

    • No games qualify


    Monday Night Football

    • Chiefs (+13) @ Steelers


    Before I get to my pick, two lines worth noting:

    • Raiders @ Ravens (0)
    • Texans @ Bears (0)


    The Ravens host the Raiders, who lost at home to the Buccaneers last week and may have lost their top two running backs. Thus far, the Ravens have played well at home and the line opened at Ravens (-6). Did last weeks Steeler performance help move some money? You bet!

    The Bears opened at 0 and are stuck there. Their offense has to get out of the rut and contribute early. I wish we had this game in play this week.

    Dave's Week #10 Upset Special:

    Decisions, decisions...

    • @Jaguars (+3) : The Jags are a better at home than they are on the road, does it matter?
    • Titans (+7) : This game is all about the Dolphins, I'm not ready to pick against them.
    • @Panthers (+4) : Denver is on the road again and the Panthers still hope to make noise. Can the Panthers D confuse Peyton for more than 30 minutes?
    • Chargers (+3) : Can they stop the Buccaneers run without opening up to their passing attack?
    • @Bengals (+4) : Bengals fans would love 60 minutes of good football some week. Will they get it?


    I'm taking the Bengals, in the hope that they play great or the Giants follow the script.

    Comments 33 Comments
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Nothing stands out this week, which means something crazy's gots ta happen. I'll go Buffalo (+12). That's right. I said it!.
    1. mikesteelnation1's Avatar
      Chargers please
    1. buzmeg's Avatar
      Chargers +3
    1. StarvinMarvin's Avatar
      Titans for no particular reason
    1. DaBearsFan's Avatar
      Jets
    1. jfkaspar's Avatar
      panthers
    1. BobbyJ's Avatar
      Jets
    1. BuckeyeRidley's Avatar
      Chiefs.
    1. sambam44's Avatar
      no upsets
    1. Colts01's Avatar
      Ugghhhh....Jets.
    1. brauneyz's Avatar
      So far, Titans and Bengals have made a few campers happy. Let's hope the Jesters are not as accommodating.

      Oh yeah, friggin' Chargers! I am never, ever picking you guys again, for anything!
    1. edave's Avatar
      The results thus far with one game remaining for any one still interested in joining this week...



      The Chiefs aren't going to be popular tomorrow evening but they do have some support here. Join them if you haven't taken a chance yet.
    1. edave's Avatar
      Week 10 is in the books, final points:



      Congratulations to StarvinMarvin and vancemeek for winning the week with the Titans.

      The lead group remains at six wins: Trumpetbdw, chris, Colts01, brauneyz and Pruitt are the front runners and Trumpetbdw has retained a narrow lead on points. DaBearsFan, iwatt, mikesteelnation1 and jfkaspar are one win back.

      Full standings
  • Recent Forum Posts

    Ray Rice

    Nancy On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 21:10:53 -0600

    Put Greg Hardy right next to him in that statement and I'm with you, vancemeek. Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    vancemeek On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:55:06 -0600

    Also, for the record, if Ray Rice never plays another down, I'd consider it a great thing. Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    vancemeek On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:53:56 -0600

    For the record, according to Ed Werder, the Colts have no interest in Ray Rice.
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/11/18/report-colts-not-interested-in-ray-rice-if-hes-reinstated/ Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    tubbs1518 On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:44:31 -0600

    This, this and so much more this. Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    buzmeg On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:43:24 -0600

    Ray Rice is the poster child for the NFL's "NO MORE" campaign. Indy seems to be the initial choice for a Rice signing. He (Rice) and Irsay would make for a dymamic duo. Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    Amy On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:15:15 -0600

    I think that if people were sure he could still play, Rice would be signed.

    However, I also think that there is doubt he can still play. He was not that good last season, and if teams are not... Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    tubbs1518 On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:17:21 -0600

    The same way people have gotten past everything else athletes have done in the past. That isn't going to change. Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    Matt Kocsan On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:44:58 -0600

    That video can be replayed forever and the outcome will be the same every time. I just don't see how there's any getting past it for most people. Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    tubbs1518 On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:12:47 -0600

    I honestly don't think it will alienate fans as much as people think. There were already women wearing Rice jerseys to Ravens games after it all came out. AP has taken a lot of the spotlight away... Go to last post

    Ray Rice

    Matt Kocsan On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:25:53 -0600

    Winning playoff games is useful in football terms, sure, but in business terms it's really useful because it generates more revenue. I think Rice is still radioactive enough that it's a wash, and... Go to last post