• 2012 FP Upset Special Challenge: Week #13

    brauneyz and Pruitt are our leaders, brauneyz leads by a tiny margin. Trumpetbdw DaBearsFan jhinkamp chris Colts01 and mikesteelnation1 are one win back.

    Current standings.

    Last weeks results.

    Season to date.

    Now on to Week #13 of the FP Upset Special Challenge. Let's get busy.

    You can join us every week. You can join mid-season. If you miss a week, so what? Come back next week. We're just glad you're here and you'll always have me to talk to down at the bottom of the standings.


    • One pick per week
    • Your chosen team must be at least a (+3) underdog (Only games listed in this column are eligible)
    • Your chosen team must win the game outright (no 'pushes' or 'covers')
    • Season winner is the one with the most upsets correctly chosen between Week #1 through the Conference Championship Games (20 weeks all together)
    • There will be a points system to determine a winner in the event of a tie
    • Points will be accumulated by adding the game spreads for your correct picks (if you take Carolina (+4.5) and Carolina wins, you will be awarded a win and 4.5 points). Be careful making picks based on the number of points possible. Points only count if you are tied for the total wins lead when the whole contest is finished.
    • The No Upsets Option: Predict correctly that 'No Upsets' will occur in any given week and you will be awarded one win and a point total equal to the sum of all the spreads in that week's Upset Special. If you wish to exercise the 'No Upsets' Option, that prediction is due by 5 minutes prior to kickoff of the first game of the week in question. This includes Thursday Night Football and Saturday Playoff games. The 'No Upsets' option is confined to the Upset Possibilities listed in this article.
    • Picks are due no later than 5 minutes before the scheduled start of the broadcast time for your game. The FootballPros.com time stamp on your post is gospel.
    • Spread lines will be posted Wednesday and will remain static throughout the week. This isn't The Sports Book at Caesar's Palace, after all.

    Prizes to be determined but may include a cool icon denoting your status as *ahem* Upset Special Top Dog, a hat or t-shirt or possibly tickets to the Super Bowl (NOT!!)

    Week #13 Upset Special Possibilities (odds by OddsShark). Underdogs in bold.

    Thursday Night Football

    • Saints (+3.5) @ Falcons

    Sunday Early Games

    • Cardinals (+4.5) @ Jets
    • Jaguars (+5.5) @ Bills
    • Patriots @ Dolphins (+8.5)
    • Colts (+4.5) @ Lions
    • Texans @ Titans (+5.5)
    • Seahawks (+4.5) @ Bears
    • Vikings (+9.5) @ Packers
    • 49ers @ Rams (+8)

    Sunday Late Games

    • Buccaneers (+8) @ Broncos

    Sunday Night Football

    • Eagles (+10.5) @ Cowboys

    Monday Night Football

    • No games qualify

    Dave's Week #13 Upset Special Dud Thing:

    After flipping a mental coin for most of a day I finally settled on the Cardinals to knock off the Jets. Then again, it's completely possible that neither team scores. Go Cards! Blech.

    Comments 28 Comments
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Eagles (+10.5)

      Yes, I'll be the fool who bets against the most scared late-game playcaller in the league. Plus, I like the fact that taking the Eagles right now makes less than zero sense.
    1. Afrocomb's Avatar
    1. buzmeg's Avatar
      None, all faves cover.
    1. BobbyJ's Avatar
    1. mikesteelnation1's Avatar
    1. vancemeek's Avatar
    1. chris's Avatar
    1. edave's Avatar
      Week 13 is in the books, final points:

      Congratulations to Colts01 for winning the week with the Rams. brauneyz now leads the pack with 8 wins, followed by DaBearsFan, Colts01, jhinkamp, mikesteelnation1 and Pruitt all at 7.

      Full standings

      The complete season to date.
  • Recent Forum Posts

    Illegal bat

    Matt Kocsan On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:02:30 -0500



    We can't stop here. This is bat country. Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    Matt Kocsan On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:37:01 -0500

    By the way:

    (3a) Unless an illegal bat by the offense results in a loss of down, which on a fourth down play would mean a turnover (plus the ball placed either at the spot of the foul or if it... Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    Matt Kocsan On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:27:52 -0500

    I more or less agree with all of this, but I'd like to expand on a couple of points here:

    (1) Wright definitely did it on purpose. Unless he's the dumbest man alive or has a broken left hand, no... Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    Patrick Sullivan On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:46:54 -0500

    You cannot assume this is a certainty. If a football was round, you could, but that ball could have bounced in any direction when it next hit the turf. Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    hobbes27 On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:30:43 -0500

    You are right that on the play, it looks like there wasn't a Lion around. But that doesn't mean there was a zero percent chance that a Lion could not have recovered it. And I am always... Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    Amy On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:45:36 -0500

    I don't blame the officials for this at all.

    Let's not forget that not 1, not 2, not 3, but 6 different NFL head coaches gave the competition commitee proposals to allow expanded replay for... Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    hobbes27 On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:43:24 -0500

    Yeah, exactly. I say the same thing to whiny Cowboy fans who still complain about the Dez Bryant no catch. Go to last post


    Amy On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:39:26 -0500

    Week 4 Update:

    John Hussey: 88 (78 accepted, 6 declined, 4 offsetting)
    John Parry: 80 (67 accepted, 11 declined, 2 offsetting)
    Jerome Boger: 71 (59... Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    Patrick Sullivan On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 05:50:52 -0500

    Dear Detroit Lions -

    Score. More. Points.

    That way, this conversation is moot.


    One very frustrated fan Go to last post

    Illegal bat

    Evan Vracar On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 04:19:08 -0500

    So here's where I come down on this, and I may be completely foolish for thinking so.

    I think this is a rule that can be open to interpretation. Obviously, if a referee doesn't deem that there was... Go to last post