• Top 10...Bottom 5: Big Decisions, Happy Trees, and Your Post Draft NFL Power Rankings



    As is our custom here at Football Pros, we like to have some fun with the NFL power rankings by throwing out a piece we call “Top 10… Bottom 5”. This article is our own irreverent spoof on the pointless exercise that is compiling a power rankings list. The rub of it is, we like to denigrate the validity of power rankings by creating our own set of--you guessed it-- POWER RANKINGS. Hey, as I always say…



    And if you don’t believe that, then perhaps you’ll listen to Mr. Bob Ross.


    No, not that guy… THIS GUY!!!




    With the draft now more than a week into our rear-view mirror, and the first round of mini-camps now mostly complete, for the next few months, the NFL will be filled with nothing but soft clouds and happy little trees. What follows is my take on the actual current standing of many of our favorite NFL teams.

    *Writer’s note- You’ll be hearing more from Bob Ross later (may he rest in peace.) Why, you may ask? Because I can…

    **Editor’s note (I’m serving as both writer and editor of this article)- In a related story, this is the first (and likely last) time I’ll be allowed to put together a Top 10…Bottom 5. So I hope you all enjoy it. Or at the very least, I hope you all have tolerated it enough to get this far. And if you’ve tolerated it to this point, you may as well keep on reading the entire thing. Plus, there’s a comment section at the end where you can tell me exactly what you really think. Just don’t come after Bob Ross. He’ll haunt your dreams…



    Top 10

    1. Seattle Seahawks- The Champs are still loaded, and have earned the right to hold onto the #1 perch. But what makes them even better is that Russell Wilson should be playing with a clear mind now that he gets to escape each day without ever having to hear or utter that loaded question, “How was your day, honey?”

    2. Green Bay Packers- A depleted Packers roster nearly beat SF in the playoffs. Just a guess, but Scott Tolzien, Matt Flynn, and Seneca Wallace don’t combine this year to start nearly half of their games. They’ve added defensive reinforcement, and Aaron Rodgers is healthy again. Look out.

    3. San Francisco 49ers- If not for a lack of depth at Long Snapper, and igniting a QB controversy and divided locker room by signing Blaine Gabbert, I may have put the Niners at #1.

    4. Denver Broncos- What we saw last year in the Super Bowl cannot be undone. Their FA signings feel desperate. I don’t think this is the best team in the AFC, but I’m not yet sure who is. Therefore, by default, the Broncos hold onto this spot. But their grip is weakening fast.

    5. New England Patriots- Can you believe there are 3rd grade boys all across the New England region that weren’t yet born the last time the Patriots actually won a Super Bowl?

    6. St. Louis Rams- You heard me! This exercise is a look ahead, not a look back. The Redskins did what they had to do to get RGIII (the right move, FTR), but the Rams haul may look 90s Cowboy-like in a few years. They may be 3rd in their division, making a playoff berth a challenge, but this is going to be one of the most dangerous teams in the NFL in 2014.

    7. Pittsburgh Steelers- Homer pick? Sure. But they finished very strong, and wisely determined in the draft that the best way to fix a defense that ranked 30th in INTs is to first fix a defense that also finished only 25th in sacks. The streak of missing the playoffs will end at 2.

    8. New Orleans Saints- Drew Brees enters the season looking for an incredible 4th straight 5000 yard season. To put that into some perspective, Brett Favre never had 3 straight 4000 yard seasons in his career. But the Saints no longer feel like a legit Super Bowl contender to me, mainly due to the fact that on the road, Brees saw his comp% drop by nearly 10 pts, YPA drop by nearly 2 ½, TDs cut by more than half, INTs tripled, and a subsequent rating more than 40 points less than at home. Their spot in the top 10 is tenuous at best.

    9. Chicago Bears- The last team to allow as many yards rushing as the Bears allowed last year was the 2008 Lions (at least their shovel was sharp, and their will was outstanding). The last team to allow as many yards per carry was the 2006 Super Bowl Champion Indianapolis Colts. Both the Colts and Lions improved upon those numbers significantly the following season. As long as the Bears regress (or in this case, progress) to the mean, I expect they’ll be a playoff team this year.

    10. Indianapolis Colts- I’ll take my chances since Andrew Luck is by far and away the best QB in the division. But as the AFC South gradually improves, how will the Colts respond?



    Honorable Mention-
    Baltimore Ravens- Mama always said, if I can’t say anything nice…
    Arizona Cardinals- Remember when the Cardinals were in the NFC East? That serves as no consolation to them now…
    Cincinnati Bengals- If I were ranking zoo animals, the Bengals would be near the top of the list. Bengal tigers are awesome.
    Houston/Atlanta/Washington- At least two of these three teams are going to reclaim their role as a legit playoff contender.



    Bottom 5 with analysis taken from actual quotes by the late, great Bob Ross, because, as Bob Ross would say “Water's like me. It's laaazy... Boy, it always looks for the easiest way to do things.” There’s nothing lazier than replacing actual analysis and research with random quotes from a semi-famous public access oil painter.

    28. Carolina Panthers- “We don’t make mistakes, we just have happy accidents.” Your defending NFC South Division Champions!!!

    29. Jacksonville Jaguars- “We want happy paintings. If you want sad things, watch (the Jacksonville Jaguars)…”



    30. Minnesota Vikings- “Oh, that would make a nice place to fish. I like fishing, but I'm not a very good fisherman. I always throw the fish back into the water, just put a band-aid on his mouth, tap 'im on the patootie and let him on his way. And maybe some day, if I'm lucky, I'll get to catch him again.”

    31. Oakland Raiders- “{The secret to doing anything is believing that you can do it. Anything that you believe you can do strong enough, you can do. Anything. As long as you believe.}” (even Bob Ross had a sick sense of humor)

    32. Tennessee Titans- “We don’t know where it goes. We don’t really care.”

    Dishonorable Mention-
    Detroit Lions- "We want our checks and that's good enough for us. Winning isn't that important as long as we get our paycheck.” (oops… wrong Bob Ross)
    NFC East- “Trees cover up a multitude of sins.”
    Cleveland Browns- “Let's just blend this little rascal here, ha! Happy as we can be.”
    Miami Dolphins- “Haha, and just beat the devil out of it.” (Ok, so that probably was a bit out of line)
    Buffalo Bills- “Just scrape in a few indications of sticks and twigs and other little things in there. People will think you spend hours doing this.”

    Comments 28 Comments
    1. mkocs6's Avatar
      God, Trumpet, I already told you, the Rams are going 7-9 until forever. Or until Sam Bradford shows me something. Like the ability to throw passes than average more than 6.3 YPA, or the ability to fall properly so that he doesn't destroy his shoulder.

      No to the Texans, too. I know it's just honorable mention, but with the BOB connection and the Ryan Fitzpatrick, Case Keenum, and/or Tom Savage Experience coming down the pike in 2014, I'm with Andre Johnson on this one. I mean, it's a weak division, sure, but that's only like four wins, best case scenario.

      I like bold predictions, though. I think the top five is about spot-on. I think the Steelers and Saints are worthy, but I do think there's a pretty serious drop-off after #5 (and not just because you put the Rams at #6). I like the Bears, too, and accept the Colts appearing in the top ten, because of that awful division, the way I accept inevitable things.

      Perhaps the Carolina Panthers find your Bottom 5 a bit harsh, but I can't really argue with any of it. Everybody there has got to win some games are everyone else can rightly go on thinking that they suck.
    1. tubbs1518's Avatar
      I listed my bottom 5 teams in the NFL on twitter the other day and the Steelers were in it. I don't see them near the top 10.
    1. mkocs6's Avatar
      I don't think they're Super Bowl contenders, but I think if Pittsburgh
      has a reasonably healthy year, they could end up in the Top 10. I think I might have just described every team in the AFC North, though. Nobody's great, everyone has some potential. It's still close enough to Be A Homer Day that I'll allow it.

      Really, though, isn't biggest gap on this list between 3 and 4? If I were placing a wager on a Super Bowl winner pre-season, I can't see myself putting money on any team but one of those three.
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by mkocs6 View Post
      God, Trumpet, I already told you, the Rams are going 7-9 until forever. Or until Sam Bradford shows me something. Like the ability to throw passes than average more than 6.3 YPA, or the ability to fall properly so that he doesn't destroy his shoulder.

      No to the Texans, too. I know it's just honorable mention, but with the BOB connection and the Ryan Fitzpatrick, Case Keenum, and/or Tom Savage Experience coming down the pike in 2014, I'm with Andre Johnson on this one. I mean, it's a weak division, sure, but that's only like four wins, best case scenario.

      I like bold predictions, though. I think the top five is about spot-on. I think the Steelers and Saints are worthy, but I do think there's a pretty serious drop-off after #5 (and not just because you put the Rams at #6). I like the Bears, too, and accept the Colts appearing in the top ten, because of that awful division, the way I accept inevitable things.

      Perhaps the Carolina Panthers find your Bottom 5 a bit harsh, but I can't really argue with any of it. Everybody there has got to win some games are everyone else can rightly go on thinking that they suck.
      Rams- They have a nasty defense, an improving offensive line, some nice weapons on offense, and I really like adding Tre Mason to the mix. I agree that I want to see Bradford open things up more, and they are lacking that one go-to weapon (wouldn't Andre Johnson instantly turn this team into a legit Super Bowl contender?), but Bradford doesn't make too many mistakes, Shaun Hill as the backup QB is good enough to win with, and Jeff Fisher is the king of helping a conservative team overachieve in the regular season, just prior to ripping the carpet out from underneath his fan base once the postseason gets underway.

      Texans- I'm a big enough believer in BOB that yes, I think they're good enough right now to compete with Indy for that division. I also feel like their starting QB isn't yet on the roster. Their grade is based on their roster as of right now, but if they can find a way to add a serviceable starting QB to the mix, I think they'll earn me a profit on my ranking.
    1. Andy Freeland's Avatar
      Putting 3 NFC West teams in the top 10 has to violate some FP by-law. I'm headed to the FP law library. Everything you say about the Rams is true, they do have a very good defense and some weapons on offense, but I just can't believe in them. Probably something to do with Sam Bradford. Playing in that division doesn't help.
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by tubbs1518 View Post
      I listed my bottom 5 teams in the NFL on twitter the other day and the Steelers were in it. I don't see them near the top 10.
      One thing that always gets me is how every offseason Power Ranking that I read is way too reliant upon last year's results. I wanted to create a ranking that's looking ahead, based on the current construction of each team's roster/predicted performance. So does this list look different than others in spots? Intentionally so. NFL.com and espn.com both have the Panthers currently as the 11th best team in the league. I'm sorry, but they're going to be terrible. The ONLY reason to have a team like the Panthers that high is based on last year's results. But no, as currently constructed, the Panthers are not a top 20 (or even top 25) team. They also have the Redskins rated as (by far) the worst team in the NFC East. I suppose that's more plausible, but again, I just don't see it. In fact, by the looks of things, I think everyone is being way too negative about RGIII, because I see them as the best team in that division.

      The Steelers were the best team in the AFC North over the 2nd half of last season, and they've improved since then. I was also pretty consistent in ranking the teams with the top QBs in division as the best team in that division (including Washington- I'm expecting a huge year from RGIII). Yes, the Bengals will be healthier to start the season than they were when the season finished, but I have serious concerns about their QB play and their secondary.

      The Steelers have not addressed their secondary as much as I would have liked, but their front 7, which has been very disappointing over the past couple of years, looks to be back to being an impactful group. That fact alone will help their aging secondary, as will the signing of Mike Mitchell, which was not a splash FA signing per se, but does bring them someone whose skill set is a perfect fit for what they want from their Free Safety.

      Homer goggles? Perhaps a bit. I admitted as much in the article. But my goggles are borne in some truth. The Steelers have a great coach, a great QB, and have figured out a way to keep him on the field. That along puts them nowhere near being one of the worst 5 teams in the league.


      Bob Ross wasn't afraid to take risks when it came to his oil paintings, and I'm not afraid to take risks when it comes to arbitrarily ranking NFL teams, and then subsequently acting like my list is the be all end all. But thanks for reading, and for sharing your opinion. Every opinion is valued, no matter how much I may strongly disagree.
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by Andy Freeland View Post
      Putting 3 NFC West teams in the top 10 has to violate some FP by-law. I'm headed to the FP law library. Everything you say about the Rams is true, they do have a very good defense and some weapons on offense, but I just can't believe in them. Probably something to do with Sam Bradford. Playing in that division doesn't help.
      True. Also, they may very well be one of the 6 or 7 best teams in the NFL and still miss out on the playoffs (much like Arizona last year).

      I agree that Bradford's 6.4 YPA is unacceptable. But his Adjusted YPA was a much more tolerable 6.8 (same as Andrew Luck, and only .1 behind Brady, Newton, Stafford, and Cutler). He also was on pace last year for over 30 TDs and fewer than 10 INTs. Yes, he's overly cautious, but with this team, that may be all they need.

      Bradford is showing steady improvement, is now in year 5, and has a trend of playing in all 16 games every other year. But even if he misses time, having Shaun Hill in that backup role instead of Kellen Clemens allows the Rams to remain competitive.
    1. Patrick Sullivan's Avatar
      The Scrams are a QB away from being world beaters. IF Sammy Bradford can show something, they might be a top ten team. But can Bradford play even 13 or 14 games? I have trouble seeing that (especially in that division - 6 games against the pass rushers of the 'Hawks, Niners and Cards? Ouch). Outside their division they have to play the AFC West, NFC East, the Lions and the Falcons. I could see the Rams going 9-7, maybe and 9-7 coming out the NFC West would be impressive. But top 10? Eh... Probably not.
    1. Rich Gapinski's Avatar
      Adam Carolla is a curse on teams he likes and on teams he bets on. Adam Carolla is a Rams fan. They have no chance.

      EDIT: Oh, and how dare you putting the Bears in the top 10. I mean, I've been sitting here secretly confident in the team and what they have done; hoping that no one has really noticed. Now this. This list. I will not let you let me start acting outwardly confident. Nope. Not going to happen. I am now going to watch as many overthrown Cutler passes as I can on "All 22." And every running play against the Bears defense. See, Trumpet, a Bears season is supposed to go like last season: Mediocrity, some flashes of brilliance, some ridiculous reason to start feeling good and then the dreams get crushed by the Packers, Chris Conte or something else that sucks. Pre-season optimism does not fly here, sir. The Bears have shown us fans that this is way for a good 22 years now and I will not have you screw it up.
    1. mkocs6's Avatar
      I'm sorry, Trumpet, I don't want to hear about 'steady improvement' from a #1 overall pick heading into year five. He plays in Missouri and he needs to Show-Me. Period. What's troubling to me, too, is that with such a low YPA, he still isn't completing 62% of his passes. Also, did I miss a major wide receiver signing in St. Louis? They have good backs, but they need major steps forward from receivers who also haven't done much as yet. Andre Johnson, certainly, would be a welcome addition, but that would pretty much put a .45 to the head of the Texans' season before it begins. About that...

      I find the Steelers' ranking much less controversial than the Rams' or Texans'. At this point, no finish in the AFC North would surprise me (except the Browns as division champs--not happening, but I could envision ways in which they climb out of the basement, given the right combination of possibilities). I understand that these are prospective rankings, and I thought Houston was an instant playoff contender if they drafted someone like Manziel or Bridgewater, but I just don't see the quarterback available at this point who will vault them up into serious playoff contention. The AFC isn't strong, but I still think the wild cards come out the North and the West.
    1. mkocs6's Avatar
      Here, my best case scenario for the 2014 Rams? I think last year's Kansas City Chiefs, basically.
    1. tubbs1518's Avatar
      Outside of QB there isn't a position group I really believe in on the Steelers. You have Brown with a receiver who hasn't played much at all in Wheaton and a huge project in Bryant. Offensive line still isn't that good. Front 7 neither inspires or scares me. Pass rush isn't intimidating. I don't think the front 3 can keep blockers off Shazier and if they don't he won't be that good. The back 4 still aren't very good. I just don't see a good team.
    1. wxwax's Avatar
      Love it, trumpet. I enjoy reading way-way-early prognostications. A few reactions.

      Seahawks will be hurting on offense. They're going to have some injuries this season, just based on the odds. And also based on the odds, they won't sustain last year's excellence. I'm a big believer in Pete Carroll and I think Russell Wilson is excellent. But I see a little regression.

      I like how Denver has bolstered the weak areas in their defense. I don't see an offensive drop-off, even without Decker. The opposition may get stronger in the AFC, but I think Denver will be right there again.

      I think there's a very good chance Atlanta will be a top-10 team by the end of the season. Their moves have been good. Last year their awful play was like throwing a handful of dust in everyone's eyes. Nobody can see this team straight. Some folks here even think that Dimitroff will be fired at the end of the season. Mike Smith might be, depending upon how they fare in the playoffs. But overall they're marching forward again. Answer me this: who wants to play the Falcons? They're going to be a tough out.

      Washington may or may not be better. RGIII will improve, for health reasons alone. But that offensive line has too many unanswered questions on the right side. An awful lot is riding on a rookie guard and right tackle. Too much, I fear. And that safety/linebacker corps is another gaping wound. Special teams will be better, perhaps much better. But I think this season is about baby steps.

      It seems to me that New England's fate rests largely on the progress of its divisional opponents. The Jets, Dolphins and Bills have been woeful forever. All have a very young QB. If any of them show life -- and I'm thinking it might be Miami -- then NE's easy path to the playoffs might be a little rougher than it has been.

      I shall be very curious to see how efficient San Francisco's offense will be. I don't doubt that their defense will be stellar again. I also wonder whether players will begin tuning out Mr. No Off Switch?

      Tidbits: I'm surprised you don't name check the Eagles; they could be very good. I agree, the Panthers may be terrible. The Lions may be a surprise contender.
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by mkocs6 View Post
      I'm sorry, Trumpet, I don't want to hear about 'steady improvement' from a #1 overall pick heading into year five. He plays in Missouri and he needs to Show-Me. Period. What's troubling to me, too, is that with such a low YPA, he still isn't completing 62% of his passes. Also, did I miss a major wide receiver signing in St. Louis? They have good backs, but they need major steps forward from receivers who also haven't done much as yet. Andre Johnson, certainly, would be a welcome addition, but that would pretty much put a .45 to the head of the Texans' season before it begins. About that...

      I find the Steelers' ranking much less controversial than the Rams' or Texans'. At this point, no finish in the AFC North would surprise me (except the Browns as division champs--not happening, but I could envision ways in which they climb out of the basement, given the right combination of possibilities). I understand that these are prospective rankings, and I thought Houston was an instant playoff contender if they drafted someone like Manziel or Bridgewater, but I just don't see the quarterback available at this point who will vault them up into serious playoff contention. The AFC isn't strong, but I still think the wild cards come out the North and the West.
      Bradford to this point in his career looks an awful lot like Matt Ryan at a similar point in his career. Ryan ended his 2010 with 46 career starts, whereas Bradford currently has 49 career starts. The rate stats for Bradford and Ryan in those two seasons are nearly identical, down to the low Y/A in the mid 6s, and an AY/A that's closer to 7. The difference is that Ryan had Roddy White and Tony Gonzalez, while Bradford doesn't have weapons that are nearly as established.

      That said, Ryan took a step forward in 2011, increasing his Y/A by nearly a full point, and then had a huge 2012. Yes, he added Julio Jones which helped facilitate his leap, but there's projectable improvement likely for the Rams receivers this year. I'd expect Tavon Austin to contribute more in year 2, Brian Quick and Chris Givens have both shown flashes, Austin Pettis can be a decent possession guy, Jared Cook is a decent weapon at TE, and whatever they can get out of a Kenny Britt, who flashed a bit with Fisher in Ten, is bonus.

      And even if his rate stats stay in line with last year, Ryan rode those near exact rate stats in 2010 to a 13-3 record, thanks to a very good running game. Bradford has the makings for having similar support from his running game, and has a legit defense. Add in just a small amount of progress from he and his young receivers, and that's the makings of a top 10 playoff contender. It still may only be good for 3rd in the west, but that's a good team they've built in St. Louis.
    1. Patrick Sullivan's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by Trumpetbdw View Post
      Bradford to this point in his career looks an awful lot like Matt Ryan at a similar point in his career. Ryan ended his 2010 with 46 career starts, whereas Bradford currently has 49 career starts. The rate stats for Bradford and Ryan in those two seasons are nearly identical, down to the low Y/A in the mid 6s, and an AY/A that's closer to 7. The difference is that Ryan had Toddy White and Tony Gonzalez, while Bradford doesn't have weapons that are nearly as established.

      That said, Ryan took a step forward in 2011, increasing his Y/A by nearly a full point, and then had a huge 2012. Yes, he added Julio Jones which helped facilitate his leap, but there's projectable improvement likely for the Rams receivers this year. I'd expect Tavon Austin to contribute more in year 2, Brian Quick and Chris Givens have both shown flashes, Austin Pettis can be a decent possession guy, Jared Cook is a decent weapon at TE, and whatever they can get out of a Kenny Britt, who flashed a bit with Fisher in Ten, is bonus.

      And even if his rate stats stay in line with last year, Ryan rode those near exact rate stats in 2010 to a 13-3 record, thanks to a very good running game. Bradford has the makings for having similar support from his running game, and has a legit defense. Add in just a small amount of progress from he and his young receivers, and that's the makings of a top 10 playoff contender. It still may only be good for 3rd in the west, but that's a good team they've built in St. Louis.
      Uuuuhhmmmmmmmmm...

      2010 was Matt Ryan's third season. Bradford has finished four seasons (2010,2011,2012, 2013) for an average of about 10.25 starts per year. I had no idea Sammy boy had actually started all 16 games twice in his career (2010, 2012). I don't see much correlation between Bradford and Ryan. Ryan has been far superior to Sammy.
    1. mkocs6's Avatar
      @Trumpet: I think that's a very optimistic assessment of Bradford's play. Even if we're just talking about basic efficiency numbers, Ryan completed a higher percentage of his passes for a higher YPA in his rookie season than Bradford has completed in any season of his career. I understand that improvement is possible, that guys do take next steps and all that, but after fifty starts I also think we all have a pretty good idea of what a guy is. I'm not saying that you're definitely wrong and Bradford can't be more than he is now, but I am saying that I'm done waiting for that to happen, or expecting it to happen, and he just has to go out and do it and I'm not staking anything on him until he does.

      The problem for me, too, is that... look, I've watched a lot of crappy wide receivers in Cleveland. Brian Quick has pretty much done nothing in two years in the league (less than thirty catches in two full seasons without a significant injury). Chris Givens has done more, but even he's not any more productive than Greg Little. (We can talk about the drops for Little, but seriously, look at the numbers. For Givens, yards per catch is higher, sure, but he also had forty fewer catches and half the touchdowns through two seasons. Forty fewer catches and half the touchdowns of Greg Little! And both of them were basically playing on teams with no other wide receivers to speak of, and Little also had an all-time bad quarterback throwing the ball in his year 2.) Tavon Austin is the most interesting player of the group and it's hard for rookie receivers to break out (it is), but most of highlights reels came in the kicking game last year and I have a hard time banking on a guy who's 5'9" to be a true #1. I just have a hard time seeing this. It's a group of receivers--with Cook, Britt, whoever, too--that the quarterback needs to make better and I'm not sure the group is capable of doing it the other way around.

      You factor in that division they play in and I'm just having a hard time seeing it. Patrick mentioned those pass-rushers, but those corners! Anyone think Tavon Austin is getting open against Richard Sherman or Patrick Peterson? Has Bradford shown the ability (yet) in the pros to throw a guy like that (his size is a factor here, too) open? Like I said, I'm not saying it's impossible, but I don't share your faith here.

      That said, their defense should be really good. Their defensive line is nasty and deep, their linebackers can tackle, and their secondary isn't bad. I think they can win games if they keep their opponents under 20, but that's so hard to do consistently. I feel like this is a team that's going to see a decent number of games slip away in the fourth quarter.

      I mean, unless I'm wrong, which has happened before.
    1. mkocs6's Avatar
      By the way, welcome to The Most We've Ever Talked about the Rams on FP...
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Sullivan View Post

      Uuuuhhmmmmmmmmm...

      2010 was Matt Ryan's third season. Bradford has finished four seasons (2010,2011,2012, 2013) for an average of about 10.25 starts per year. I had no idea Sammy boy had actually started all 16 games twice in his career (2010, 2012). I don't see much correlation between Bradford and Ryan. Ryan has been far superior to Sammy.
      Yes it was Ryan's 3rd season. Yes, it took Bradford 4 years to accumulate the same amount of starts as Ryan. But it's also true that Ryan had a much better offensive supporting cast, both in weapons in the passing game, and a dynamic rush attack. This season will mark Bradford's best offensive support of his career.

      We are all harsh on Bradford because he misses games. But as QBs develop, and as their protection improves, history suggests that other similarly fragile QBs can figure out a way to stay healthy. Chad Pennington, Drew Brees, and Matt Stafford are 3 examples of QBs who have found success after freak shoulder issues. Bradford has mostly avoided the soft tissue injuries that tend to linger.

      Considering his pedigree, and the urgency surrounding his performance this season, there's legit projectability here. Every season, there are teams and players that break out. Based on my research, despite all the talk of Tampa and some others, I think the most likely breakout threat this year is in St. Louis. And based on their current top-to-bottom roster, along with the general parity outside the top 4 or 5 teams, I see a top 7 team.
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Every year I seem to hitch my wagon to one QB that I expect to break out. I was never a Matt Ryan guy, but jumped on that bandwagon before his massive season in 2012. Last year, as many were questioning Cam Newton, he became that guy for me. This year, it's a bit more of a limb, but I'm currently thinking that Sam Bradford is that breakout QB.
    1. Trumpetbdw's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by mkocs6 View Post
      By the way, welcome to The Most We've Ever Talked about the Rams on FP...
      I'm strangely proud of this. I didn't expect to be this high on St. Louis when I started putting the article together, but I guess I kinda figured this was the direction we'd head after I put them at #6.

      The Rams are not necessarily built to win in the playoffs, but they will be playing a style that is still proven to be successful in the regular season. As has been mentioned, their defense is mad nasty. They don't need a Ben Roethlisberger/Philip Rivers season out of Sam Bradford to win. Even if he's merely Alex Smith, this is a playoff team. There have been plenty of other late bloomers, including Eli Manning, who was not as good in his first 4 seasons as Bradford has been. Yes, we like our #1 overall QBs to be great from the start, but that doesn't always happen. And that should not take away from the fact that Sam Bradford is still not all that far away from being a really good NFL QB.