Antonio Brown or Golden Tate?

[RayFinkle]

So I've made my fantasy playoffs for the second year in a row and was the only player in the league to do it. But I was the wildcard and have a tough match-up against the #1 seed.

With Jordy Nelson probably out again, I'm torn between Golden Tate and Antonio Brown for my WR position. I started Tate last week and he did nothing...but that had a lot to do with their defense (which I also had!!!) dominating Arizona. The Steelers offense has sputtered, but Brown can still be a threat against Dallas...especially with Roethlisberger closer to 100% and Mike Wallace struggling. But Buffalo's pass D blows and Tate could have a big game. Any opinions are appreciated.

[wxwax]

FWIW, I wouldn't be surprised if Seattle suffers a letdown on Sunday. Coming off of a big divisional win, traveling cross country, feeling good about themselves... could lead to trouble. Then again, Buffalo.

[Trumpetbdw]

Brown. When he and Roethlisberger are healthy, he's much more consistent than Tate, and a borderline top 20-25 WR option. Tate is nothing more than a low end number 4. If he doesn't score a TD, he's essentially worthless, whereas Brown can easily help with a 5-6 catch, 70-80 yard day.

[RayFinkle]

Went with Brown and he scored 5 more points than Tate. Didn't really matter though cause I blew out my opponent. Onto my first ever fantasy championship game. Wish me luck.