The issue where NO fumbled, and the on field ruling was Dallas recovery, and MikeP said a review couldn't change WHO recovered the fumble, and the the review changed the fumble to NO recovery.
The TD for BAL, where the receiver caught the ball, turned around, got two feet in bounds, stretched for the goalline, crossed it, and then when he slammed to the ground, lost the ball out of bounds. Mike P called it "2nd act" obviously. Refs called it no catch.
The fumble by Eli where Eli got hit, ball came out, Ravens picked it up, advanced it, then fumbled it and NYG recovered. MikeP said something about defense cant advance a fumble??? What??? Refs said a pass, not fumble, but MikeP said if BAL challenged, and it was found to be a fumble, then it would be down with the first recovery. What??? But BAL didn't challenge.
And the hit by Seattle on the SF receiver, which was textbook, but massive, so got flagged.