Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Benching The Starting QB

  1. Quote Originally Posted by SpartaChris View Post
    I agree with Turk. Who gives a flying fart in space about Fantasy Football? I want my team to win, and I want them to do so by fielding the best possible roster on the field as possible. While I enjoy playing FF, it comes second to winning.
    Well said SpartaChris!!

  2. #22
       
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by Polishguy00 View Post
    Although I agree with the idea of having a relief pitcher attitude as a real-life head coach, I think it would be absolutely terrible for all of fantasy football. The discovery of the Curse of 370 and running back by committee has already ruined 41% of fantasy football, relief pitcher QBs would ruin it by another 27%. Fantasy football would be 68% less fun than just 6 or 7 years ago.
    The horror!
    I cannot believe such an astute football fan is playing the Fantasy Football card.

    Just keep in mind you are referencing a game/pastime that begins with the word "FANTASY"
    --
    buzmeg
    (aka bobC)

  3. #23
       
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    2,640
    Blog Entries
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Turk Schonert View Post
    Where has the real football fan gone? Fantasy football has skewed the thinking of too many people, I want the old true football fan back!! Fantasy football is fine, but lets get back to football thinking/cheering not fantasy thinking/cheering.
    I meant that as a joke. My interest in fantasy football has waned over the years. In no way do I think that it should not happen due to affects on fantasy football. Fantasy football continues to be just a thing that adds a little to the games but I would not do things like root against the Bears because my QB is playing them.

    I do guarantee that if QB relief occurred, there are more than a few who would use the fantasy football argument.
    The podcast: www.polishguypodcast.blogspot.com

    It's a podcast done by a ninja who is Polish!

    "I don't believe in a lot of things, but I believe in duct tape."-Miles on "Lost."

    twitter: @PguyPodcast

  4. #24
       
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    2,640
    Blog Entries
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by buzmeg View Post
    I cannot believe such an astute football fan is playing the Fantasy Football card.

    Just keep in mind you are referencing a game/pastime that begins with the word "FANTASY"
    I should have laid on sarcasm a little thicker. BTW, if you find the remains my former arse after your city tore me a new one this last week, can you send back to Ohio to my attention? Thanks.
    The podcast: www.polishguypodcast.blogspot.com

    It's a podcast done by a ninja who is Polish!

    "I don't believe in a lot of things, but I believe in duct tape."-Miles on "Lost."

    twitter: @PguyPodcast

  5. #25
    Excellent thread, Turk. It's conversations like these with someone who played and coached the position at the highest level that separates FPL from the pack.

    Perry Fewell made the correct decision going with Ryan Fitzpatrick over Trent Edwards and I hope Chan Gailey does likewise sooner rather than later. Fitz has the ability to move in the pocket and get the ball down field with more confidence than Trent. Terrell Owens said it himself. With Edwards at QB he "felt like I was just running routes." T.O. was effusive in his praise of Fitz, who recommended Owens to his former team. Ryan knows how to scramble for first downs and is not afraid to throw a block on a toss sweep, as he did a few times last season. Plays like that inspire confidence, which is precisely what Trent Edwards does not do.

    Fitzpatrick is not a starter, but there are a number of teams who went with a #2 the year prior to drafting the franchise QB. Bobby Hoying-Donovan McNabb and Tommy Maddox-Ben Roethlisberger come to mind. He outplayed Edwards in real games last season, not practice, and should have legitimately competed for the starting job. The QB competition Gailey held was a sham.

    Unfortunately, the front office and Gailey treat Edwards like a combination of a coach's son and somebody they've given a pile of guaranteed money. He was a 3rd round pick, not a 3rd overall selection. There are persistent excuses (lack of o-line and quality receivers besides Evans) you don't hear when a franchise QB is discussed. A top QB makes the WR, I don't believe it is the other way around.

    Look for Gailey to give Trent the hook when we're 0-5 at the bye. I would have done it at 0-0.
    Last edited by Darren83; 09-16-2010 at 02:29 PM.
    "I was a late round pick."
    --Chan Gailey

  6. #26
       
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    2,640
    Blog Entries
    40
    Getting back to the original thought. I think Jake Delhomme is the most likely candidate even without the ankle injury he has. He is the one on there that has such a bad recent history that it should not be a long season for him if he struggles. Plus, Holmgren clearly has some trust in Seneca Wallace.

    I also think that for QB relief to work, the incumbent QB must have the right mind-set. For instance, you could get into a Matt Leinhart situation when you don't need it. Also, I think that Sanchez looked so shell-shocked and not confident that I dunno what would be better for him. Bench him and risk him reacting even more poorly? Is it possible that the top quarterbacks in the league are the ones who could take this kind of thing well and therefore would never need a relief QB? Do you have no QB if you feel a relief QB is needed?
    The podcast: www.polishguypodcast.blogspot.com

    It's a podcast done by a ninja who is Polish!

    "I don't believe in a lot of things, but I believe in duct tape."-Miles on "Lost."

    twitter: @PguyPodcast

  7. #27
    My $.02 on the relief pitcher/QB thought:

    I think the big difference between football and baseball is the amount of games played. In baseball, the manager can decide to relieve the starter it's because 1) he may want to get a look at another pitcher; 2) to save the starter's arm for the marathon season; 3) losing 1 game out of 155 because of a pitching change isn't going to upset anyone

    In football, every game is so much more valuable. A coach isn't going to put another QB in just to take a look at him unless he really doesn't like the current starter. A coach doesn't need to save a starter's arm, although if they are losing bad enough he could take out the starter for safety reasons. Can you imagine an NFL coach switching QB's late in a game that he is winning and having that QB lose the lead? Happens all the time in baseball, but in football I think every fan would be outraged.

    Any thoughts on this?

  8. Quote Originally Posted by giantsfan97 View Post
    My $.02 on the relief pitcher/QB thought:

    I think the big difference between football and baseball is the amount of games played. In baseball, the manager can decide to relieve the starter it's because 1) he may want to get a look at another pitcher; 2) to save the starter's arm for the marathon season; 3) losing 1 game out of 155 because of a pitching change isn't going to upset anyone

    In football, every game is so much more valuable. A coach isn't going to put another QB in just to take a look at him unless he really doesn't like the current starter. A coach doesn't need to save a starter's arm, although if they are losing bad enough he could take out the starter for safety reasons. Can you imagine an NFL coach switching QB's late in a game that he is winning and having that QB lose the lead? Happens all the time in baseball, but in football I think every fan would be outraged.

    Any thoughts on this?
    I'm not talking about looking at a QB during a game. I'm talking about your starting QB (not an established franchise QB) is struggling in a game that you are losing. Your QB has thrown int's, he's missed open receivers, he's misread coverages ... he's having a bad day, and that is a major reason that your behind. If you have a backup that you believe in, and the team believes in him, why not put him in the game to change your teams energy and your chances to win? After the game, your starter is still your starter next game, and the backup remains just that ... the backup.

  9. #29
       
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ukiah, CA
    Posts
    3,726
    I'm thinking, so many teams have quarterback issues, and Turk looked like he was in pretty good shape on the web-casts...

  10. Quote Originally Posted by msclemons View Post
    I'm thinking, so many teams have quarterback issues, and Turk looked like he was in pretty good shape on the web-casts...
    Sam, put me in now ... I can win this game! Oh wait, Sam is retired ... oh snap ... so am I. Too many hits to the head. Sorry Clem, but love the thought.

Similar Threads

  1. NFP News - Steelers coaches didn't discuss benching with Ward
    By Administrator in forum National Football Post
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-16-2011, 10:51 AM
  2. NFP News - Andy Reid says benching DeSean Jackson 'right thing to do'
    By Administrator in forum National Football Post
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 11:11 AM
  3. NFP News - Jason Brown doesn't know 'rhyme or reason' for benching
    By Administrator in forum National Football Post
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-12-2011, 05:44 PM
  4. Starting a Blog
    By DannyMilk in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 04:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •