
Originally Posted by
HOF
For starters, I love the irony of being called illogical by someone crafting two different what if trade scenarios that are only possible if known facts are ignored.
Your entire McCarron trade premise is based upon the Bengals asking for much less than they were offered, thereby speeding up the negotiations. In reality the Bengals asking price was proved to be reasonable when their trade demands were accepted. Further, the trade was agreed upon with enough time remaining for the Bengals to submit their paperwork. So rather than blame the Bengals for asking for everything they could get...why not blame the Browns for being both indecisive and incompetent?
And your Kansas City trade rant is based entirely upon a rumor the Bengals have flatly denied....coupled with the same silly idea the Bengals should have demanded less to make a deal happen. But you don't even know if the Chiefs called.
Again, I got my answer, and I realize now why I couldn't remember the Bengals turning down a trade offer from the Chiefs. It didn't happen.
Just another Bengal fan fever dream.
Bookmarks