I'm not saying McNabb's not better than Brunell...I'm just trying to look into the future, because some players seem invincible and **** now, but in the history of the game, maybe they aren't in that top tier, which would be the Hall of Fame. Also, keep in mind, Brunell was on a Jacksonville team that was a franchise...should be a credit to him that they ever got to the playoffs. He had 10 career playoff games, McNabb has 16...so that makes him a Hall of Famer? Brunell was .500 as a playoff starter, McNabb's a game over at 9-7. Listen, I'm not arguing the fact that McNabb is better...it's a fact. I'm just saying, when you look back in 15-20 years, when there are 30 more quarterbacks with the same if not better stats, is he a Hall of Famer or just a really good player?
2010 Chicago Bears: NFC North Champions